Venedigerscharte
UsponHors Catégorie

Venedigerscharte

A practical Venedigerscharte cycling climb profile, with pacing, gearing, and gradient analysis for this long HC ascent in Austria.

Duž ina
31km
Prosek
5.6%
Maks
11.8%
Vrh
2,509m
Visinska razlika
1,848m
Planiraj rutu ovdeUnapred nacrtana ruta od podnožja do vrha, spremna da je proširiš u svoju vožnju.

Uspon

Profil nagiba

2486 m 775 m 0.0 km7.8 km15.5 km23.3 km31.0 km
+1848 m uspon−138 m spustMaks. nagib 11.8%

Venedigerscharte cycling climb profile

Venedigerscharte is an HC climb in Austria that asks for patience more than aggression. The headline numbers are enough to explain why: 31 km in length, 1739 m of net elevation gain, and a summit at 2509 m. Even with an average gradient of 5.6%, this is not a climb to judge by the average alone.

That average can make the ascent sound steadier than it is. The maximum gradient reaches 11.76%, which means the hardest ramps are more than twice the climb’s average pitch. There is also 1848 m of total ascent against 1739 m of net gain, so the road is not just one uninterrupted mathematical ramp from start to summit. Expect the effort to be shaped by changes in pitch, small interruptions, or profile irregularities that break rhythm and make pacing harder than a simple average suggests.

How the gradient unfolds

From the start elevation of 770 m, the climb gains height for a long time before reaching 2509 m. The main tactical feature is the combination of duration and altitude. A 31 km climb gives plenty of room to overreach early, and because the average sits at 5.6%, the early sensations may feel deceptively manageable if the road is not immediately steep.

The danger is treating the easier-feeling sections as free speed. On a climb with ramps up to 11.76%, those harder pitches will demand torque and control. If you have already spent too much energy riding above a sustainable climbing pace, the steep sections will expose it quickly. The correct read is that Venedigerscharte is a long aerobic climb with enough sharpness to punish poor gearing and impatient pacing.

Pacing strategy

Ride the opening phase as if the climb is longer than it feels. Settle below your sustainable threshold rather than chasing speed from the base. If you use power, anchor the effort around your known climbing capacity and avoid repeated surges above /glossary/ftp unless the gradient forces them. If you do not have a recent benchmark, an estimate from /tools/ftp-estimator is more useful here than riding by optimism.

The upper part matters because the summit sits at 2509 m. Even without needing to quantify the effect, that elevation changes how hard a given effort can feel late in the climb. The smarter ride is slightly conservative early, steady through the middle, and only then more committed if the legs are still responding.

Gearing notes

Bring a low climbing gear. The 5.6% average does not remove the need for it, because the 11.76% maximum gradient is where cadence can collapse if the setup is too ambitious. A gear that lets you stay seated and controlled on the steepest ramps will save muscular fatigue over the full 31 km.

The practical aim is simple: keep pressure smooth, avoid grinding whenever the road kicks up, and do not let the average gradient talk you into racing the climb too early. Venedigerscharte rewards the rider who respects the total workload, not the rider who wins the first few kilometres.

Vozio si ovaj uspon? Uporedi svoje vreme.

NeverChill beleži svaki uspon koji vozite, prati tvoje najbolje uspone i pokazuje kako se upoređuješ na onima kojima se stalno vraćaš.

Kreiraj besplatan nalog