Schöllijoch
KlimHors Catégorie

Schöllijoch

A practical profile of Schöllijoch, an HC Swiss climb with 25.2 km of sustained climbing, a 7.14% average, and brutal maximum gradients.

Lengte
25.2km
Gem.
7.1%
Max
28.9%
Top
2,426m
Hoogtewinst
1,785m
Plan hier een routeVooraf getekend van voet tot top, klaar om aan je rit toe te voegen.

De klim

Hoogteprofiel

2386 m 642 m 0.0 km6.3 km12.6 km18.9 km25.2 km
+1785 m stijging−41 m dalingMax. helling 28.9%

Schöllijoch cycling climb profile

Schöllijoch is not a climb you solve with a strong opening quarter. On paper it is 25.2 km long at an average gradient of 7.14%, rising from 629 m to 2426 m. That combination matters because the difficulty is not only the steepness, but the duration of the work. This is an HC climb because it keeps asking for controlled power long after the first steep sections have already taken their toll.

The listed net elevation gain is 1797 m, with total ascent given as 1785 m. However you interpret that slight data tension, the riding implication is clear: there is almost no meaningful downhill recovery built into the profile. This is a climb defined by sustained elevation gain rather than repeated climb-and-reset rhythm.

How the gradient unfolds

With only the headline profile data available, the safest way to read Schöllijoch is as a long, persistently uphill effort with serious gradient volatility layered on top. The 7.14% average is already demanding across 25.2 km, but the maximum gradient of 28.93% changes the pacing equation. A climb with that kind of peak steepness cannot be treated like a smooth tempo ascent, even if the overall average looks manageable for a trained rider.

The key point is that the average hides the damage. To average 7.14% across this length while also containing ramps near 28.93%, the climb likely alternates between more manageable climbing and very severe pitches. Without a detailed segment breakdown, it would be a mistake to assume where those hardest ramps arrive. Ride the whole ascent as if the steepest gradients are still ahead.

The altitude gain also shapes the feel. Starting at 629 m and finishing at 2426 m means the effort becomes more costly as the climb goes on. Even if the gradient stayed constant, the same power will feel harder near the top than near the bottom.

Pacing and gearing notes

The correct strategy is conservative early pacing. Settle below threshold, keep torque controlled, and avoid chasing speed on the lower slopes. On a 25.2 km HC climb, a few minutes spent over /glossary/ftp early can compromise the final third more than it helps the first third.

Gearing should be chosen for survival on the steepest ramps, not efficiency on the average gradient. A 7.14% average might tempt riders into standard climbing gearing, but the 28.93% maximum argues for the lowest practical setup available. If you are under-geared, you will be forced into low-cadence surges exactly when the climb demands restraint.

Practical approach:

  • Ride the opening kilometres at controlled endurance-to-tempo intensity, not at target average power.
  • Keep cadence as high as your gearing allows on the steepest sections to reduce muscular load.
  • Fuel before the climb feels hard, because the duration and elevation gain leave little margin for catching up.
  • Treat every easier patch as a chance to reset breathing and posture, not as an invitation to accelerate.

Schöllijoch rewards riders who respect the math. The average gradient tells you it is hard. The length tells you it is wearing. The maximum gradient tells you that poor gearing or over-pacing can turn a difficult climb into a fight for forward motion.

Deze al gereden? Zet je tijd ertegenover.

NeverChill houdt elke klim bij die je rijdt, volgt je beste beklimmingen en laat zien hoe je scoort op de klimmen waar je steeds naar terugkeert.

Maak een gratis account aan