Cherko la
KlimCategorie 4

Cherko la

A short, high-altitude category 4 climb in CN: 2.7 km at 3.84%, topping out at 4,730 m with a controlled but costly aerobic feel.

Lengte
2.7km
Gem.
3.8%
Max
4.8%
Top
4,730m
Hoogtewinst
84m
Plan hier een routeVooraf getekend van voet tot top, klaar om aan je rit toe te voegen.

De klim

Hoogteprofiel

4724 m 4640 m 0.0 km0.7 km1.3 km2.0 km2.7 km
+84 m stijging−0 m dalingMax. helling 4.8%

Cherko la cycling climb profile

Cherko la is a short category 4 climb in CN, but the headline number understates the main challenge. On paper, 2.7 km at an average gradient of 3.84% is controlled, even modest. The maximum gradient is only 4.84%, which tells you this is not a climb defined by violent ramps or sudden gear-breaking pitches. The difficulty comes from where the road sits: it starts at 4,628 m and reaches 4,730 m.

That changes the way the climb should be ridden. A gradient this shallow normally invites momentum, seated pressure, and a steady tempo. At this elevation, the same effort can feel more expensive than the slope suggests, so pacing discipline matters more than aggression.

How the gradient unfolds

The supplied profile is compact and consistent: 2.7 km, 102 m of net elevation gain, and an average gradient of 3.84%. With a listed maximum of 4.84%, the gradient range is narrow. That means the climb is best understood as a steady uphill drag rather than a stepped ascent with decisive steep sections.

From bottom to summit, the practical riding rhythm should be fairly even. There is no statistical signal here for a wall, a mid-climb sting, or a summit ramp. The road gains height gradually, and because the maximum gradient stays below 5%, speed preservation matters. Let the bike roll, avoid over-shifting, and keep the effort smooth enough that the altitude does not force repeated recoveries.

One note on the profile data: the listed net elevation gain is 102 m, while total ascent is listed as 84 m. Those two figures do not align perfectly, so the exact vertical accounting should be treated with caution. The core riding picture is still clear: short distance, shallow gradient, high start, high finish.

Pacing and gearing notes

Cherko la is not a climb to attack like a steep pass. The better approach is to ride just under a sustainable threshold feel, especially if it comes inside a longer route. For riders using power, this is the kind of climb where pacing from /glossary/ftp is useful, but perceived effort should be checked constantly because elevation can distort what a normal tempo effort feels like.

Gearing does not need to be built around steep gradients. A setup that lets you hold cadence comfortably on a sub-5% maximum grade is enough for the slope itself. The risk is not running out of gears, but riding too big a gear because the gradient looks easy. Stay seated, keep pressure light over the pedals, and resist the urge to force the climb early.

The final meters should feel like a continuation, not a survival effort. If you have paced it correctly, Cherko la is a steady aerobic test at altitude rather than a muscular climbing battle.

Deze al gereden? Zet je tijd ertegenover.

Neverchill registreert elke klim die je rijdt, houdt je beste beklimmingen bij en laat zien hoe je scoort op de klimmen waar je steeds naar teruggaat.

Maak een gratis account aan