
Gleirschjöchl
A long Austrian Category 1 climb where the modest average hides a serious upper-gradient demand and a full 1483 m of vertical gain.
- Length
- 32.4km
- Avg
- 4.6%
- Max
- 12.4%
- Summit
- 2,170m
- Ascent
- 1,474m
The climb
Gradient profile
Gleirschjöchl cycling climb profile
Gleirschjöchl is a long Austrian Category 1 climb that asks for patience more than aggression. On paper, 32.4 km at 4.58% looks controlled, but that average is the key tactical trap. A climb of this length with a summit at 2170 m and 1483 m of net elevation gain is not won by riding the opening ramps as if the average gradient tells the whole story.
The defining feature is the contrast between the steady overall number and the 12.37% maximum gradient. That tells you the climb is not simply a metronomic shallow drag. There are sections steep enough to force real torque, break rhythm, and expose anyone who has spent too much energy early.
How the gradient unfolds
Starting at 687 m, the road has a long way to rise before reaching the summit at 2170 m. The average gradient suggests much of the climb can be ridden at a sustainable tempo, but the maximum gradient changes how you should interpret the profile. Rather than treating Gleirschjöchl as a single steady effort, it is better to think of it as a long aerobic climb interrupted by sharper demands.
That matters because the steepest gradients come with a physiological cost that is out of proportion to their distance. A rider can sit comfortably below /glossary/ftp on the steadier ground, then lose the ride by repeatedly surging over the steeper pitches. The smart approach is to keep the flatter or easier portions genuinely controlled, so the 12.37% ramps do not require panic efforts.
Pacing strategy
The first priority is restraint. With 32.4 km of climbing, any early over-pace will compound. The average gradient may make the lower slopes feel inviting, but the climb carries enough vertical gain to punish riders who chase speed before the road has fully revealed itself.
A good pacing model is:
- Ride the lower portion at a firm but clearly sustainable endurance-to-tempo effort
- Avoid chasing short-term speed on easier gradients
- Save seated strength for the steepest ramps
- Let cadence fall slightly on the hardest pitches rather than spiking power repeatedly
- Use any easier ground to reset breathing and posture, not to accelerate unnecessarily
This is a climb where consistency beats bravado. If you are using power, anchor the effort below threshold early and reserve the hardest work for the sections where the gradient forces it. If riding by feel, the correct sensation for much of the climb is controlled pressure, not strain.
Gearing notes
Because Gleirschjöchl reaches 12.37%, gearing should be chosen for the steepest section, not the 4.58% average. A setup that feels efficient on the main body of the climb may become too heavy when the road pitches up. That is where riders start grinding, standing more than planned, and burning matches they need near the summit.
A compact climbing setup or a wide-range cassette is the sensible choice, especially for riders aiming to keep the effort aerobic for as long as possible. The goal is not just to survive the maximum gradient, but to ride it without turning the entire climb into a series of costly accelerations.
Bottom line
Gleirschjöchl is not extreme because of its average gradient. It is difficult because 32.4 km, 1483 m of gain, and gradients up to 12.37% create a climb where pacing discipline matters from the base. Treat the early kilometers as investment, not opportunity, and the upper climb becomes manageable rather than a slow unraveling.